Monday, February 24, 2020

Japanese colonialism was fundamentally different from western Essay

Japanese colonialism was fundamentally different from western colonialism. Do you agree Discuss - Essay Example Such, it cannot be generalized that all colonial nations follow the same form of colonialism that bears the same geopolitical meaning and practice across regions and continents. This fundamental difference in colonialism can be best illustrated in the case of Japan when contrasted with its colonialist counterpart in the western part of the world where its colonialist differences were identified in this paper. The most plausible cause that can be identified for this difference was that Japan jumped in the colonialist foray later than its western counterpart that it had an implication why colonialism in the East, particularly Japan, fundamentally differed from its counterpart in the West. It can be surmised that while the west has already a deep experience of colonizing, the idea of colonialism was only impinged into the consciousness of Japan in the 1870’s with the Meiji Restoration (Myers and Peattie, 1984) which has an implication on how it exercised its power and prerogative over its colonized countries. Japan’s exposure in colonialist effort was short while its western counterparts had already a long history of colonizing exploits that stretched as far back as 900 A.D. with the crusades. This wide gap in terms of colonizing experience has an implication on Japan’s motivation, purpose and method of colonizing that fundamentally differed from the West which will be elaborated in this paper. ... II. The Fundamental Difference of Japanese Colonialism from Western Colonialism A. Timeline and motivation for being a colonial power The western colonizers have a very long and deep experience in colonizing. While Japan as a country was still struggling among itself in 900 A.D., Europe has already embarked on a crusade to reclaim the Holy Land from the Turks and Saracens in the Middle East. Needless to say, the West already has already a deep experience with colonizing while Japan only learned the idea of colonialism in the 1870’s. It is also important to note that before the Meiji Restoration in the 1870’s, it came from a 200 year isolationist policy of the Tokugawa Shogunate and as such, was economically and military inferior compared to the west. In addition, Japan began with the same disadvantages just like its neighboring Asian countries. Also, just like any other non-European states, it was forced to sign unequal treaties that chafed the ire of its nationalists a s an infringement of its national sovereignty. Moreso, when Commodore Matthew Perry of the United States came to Japan in 1853 with its fleet that forced Japan to open itself to trade and end its self-imposed isolation (Myers and Peattie, 1984:78). This made Japan realize how backward they were and prompted them to embark on a nationalist endeavor to strengthen itself and become a respected country. This sentiment was recorded by a memorandum of saga samurai, Eto Shimpei in 1856 that â€Å"what was required . . ., was a long-range plan to utilize the talents, not merely of all Japanese, but of talent wherever it might be found in tools, in arms, in medicine, in land development, in astronomy, and so on, should be utilized

Friday, February 7, 2020

Forms of Business Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Forms of Business - Research Paper Example Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service. (LP) In this form, the limitation of liability is provided to the limited partners, i.e. those not actively participating in business activities while others have the unlimited personal liability. Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service, Inc. (corporation) Corporations provide limited liability to the owners of the business thus protecting from being personally liable. Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service, LLC. (LLC) The owners or members are not personally liable in this form of business. The personal liability may not be limited in sole proprietorship as well as the general partnership forms of business. But in case of general partnership, it may be made limited by registering the establishment as a limited liability partnership that provides safeguard from being personally liable in case of negligence of other partners but does not provides protection from debts or breach of contracts lawsuits. However, if a partner is not being actively involved in the business, he/she may also limit their liability by registering the establishment as limited partnership that offers limitations on the liability of non active members of the partnership. In case of Corporation as well as Limited liability corporations there is no need to change the business form in order to limit one’s liability as these business forms provide limited liability to the owners. In case of corporations, the liability is limited on the basis that ‘corporations’ are legally considered to be a separate entity from their owners and hence all the liabilities regarding business are dealt and managed by corporate assets only. b. I am engaged in a book selling business and run my business using a sole proprietorship form of business. My business is solely based on my own money hence it is solely owned by me. I tried to operate it as a partnership but was unable to find an appropriate partner so I decided to invest my ow n finances and start business. My book stall provides new as well used books. The books are either purchased from the suppliers but in case of used books, they are often donated by my class mates, friends, relatives and neighbors. Since being a small store it was not easy to expand it in the initial stage thus being the fundamental business form, sole proprietorship was adopted by me. If somehow any other individual may show interest in sharing my business, I may ensure that the business is expanded from a book stall to a book store. Since being a part time worker, it'll enable the stall to be operative full time. All of the partners share equal authority; therefore, I’ll ensure that my potential partner invests in an equal amount of money in the business. Although this form of business does not offers limited liability and each of us in case of any debt or breach of contract will be equally personally liable to the losses. Besides the significant risk offered by this form of business of personal liability, it enables the management of the business affairs by each partner. Moreover, it also protects from the disbursement of business earnings in the form of taxes, as the partners in a partnership are not employees. However each of the partners has to pay taxes from his/her share of profits share (income or loss) admitted on income tax return of each of the partners and levied a tax at corporate or at the personal rate. The main aspect of this form of business is the ease of formation and it may also be converted into limited liability partnership in case if the unlimited liability is desired to be avoided in case of other